You are hereBlogs / kristen's blog / Group Project: Wikis

Group Project: Wikis


kristen's picture

By kristen - Posted on 13 June 2008

By Chris, Jennifer, Katrina, and Kristen  

Please visit our wiki at http://www.seedwiki.com/wiki/archives_canada_staff_wiki/archives_canada_staff_wiki

 

For our group project on wikis, we decided to use Seed Wiki technology (http://www.seedwiki.com) and create a wiki for a special library setting, intended to be used by the staff members as a way to communicate with each other.  We chose Library and Archives Canada (appended for our project to Archives Canada) and tried to think of things that staff members would potentially like to see on a wiki that they may not see on their public Internet site, or their internal intranet site.  We also placed a special focus on summer students working at Archives Canada so that they could connect with each other and discover more about where they work and with whom they’re working.

 

We have created a few pages on our wiki and have added content to them: a Rules page with our basic guidelines, a FAQ page for general questions, a Staff Members page to get to know full-time members of Archives Canada (and locations for Archives Canada), a Summer Students page for students to connect with each other, and a Useful Links page with an extensive list of links that may be of interest to staff members).

  Wiki technology is fantastic for the kind of project we created because anyone can edit the pages: anyone can post questions (or answer them), delete obsolete content, add current information, and create an infinite number of new pages (clearly demonstrated with sites like Wikipedia!).  In essence, the only limitation would be a lack of access to Internet, but anyone with a connection and who can follow the instructions that any wiki-creation site provides can work with a wiki.  The editorial work is a lot like working with a basic word processor, and you can include text, pictures, links, and so on; thanks to widespread familiarity with word processors, it should not take long for most users to learn how to edit wiki content.  As mentioned, anyone can work on a wiki; hence, if our wiki was in use by Archives Canada, students and staff would all be able to contribute equally.  This is advantageous over a blog, in which only one person (or a select group of people) can update the site; with a wiki, the responsibility to update is shared among many people.  This also meant, as group members, we were able to edit each others’ work, and we are able to see previous versions of our pages (another advantage of working with wikis).  It was very easy for us to work on the project at separate times and locations as a result.

pauline's picture

Hi Chris, Jennifer, Katrina & Kristen

I am so impressed with your Wiki! The layout is great and the site is really attractive. I love a site that is nicely organized and easy to get around. Yours sure is.

I can certainly see the usefulness of such a wiki within any organization but particularly a nation-wide one. What a great idea to have staff profiles and a map with all the branch locations. This would create a sense of community within a large organization.

I like the fact that you have sections on the rules and FAQs. The annotated links are great too. Pauline

rebecca's picture

Hello Wiki group!

I just wanted to drop you a line about your wiki for the Archives Canada staff members. It looks really great and I think, with its straightforward and intuitive navigation, would be a really useful tool for facilitating communication between staff. I also have to agree with the previous comment that such a tool would have immeasurable benefits for helping to support a 'community of colleagues' for a disparate organization such as this one that has offices spread all across the country.

I could see usage of a tool like this really proliferating, depending upon how well it it socialized within the organization. Any thoughts on how the content of pages like FAQ's or Useful Links would be controlled (or perhaps organized) if staff begin posting a large amount of q&a's or links?

Great project, thanks!

chris's picture

Hopefully, like Wiki-pedia, someone on staff would take the initiative to ensure that the links remain current and that any old FAQs are taken off once they become irrelevant (like those postings about fun things to do in a certain city over the summer). Surely, in an organization like this one, there would be someone on staff who would become the de-facto person for making sure that the Staff Wiki stays useful for all in the organization.

jennifer's picture

Thank you for the great comments! Our group certainly learned a lot about wikis from doing this project. I'm glad to hear it turned out great.